Gellir lawrlwytho cynnwys at ddefnydd anfasnachol, megis defnydd personol neu ar gyfer adnoddau addysgol.
Ar gyfer defnydd masnachol cysyllwch yn uniongyrchol gyda deilydd yr hawlfraint os gwelwch yn dda.
Read more about the The Creative Archive Licence.

Disgrifiad

Tudalen 1:
[top right] Page 42 Document No 777

2nd January 1840

Lent Mr Maule ^ copy of enclosed Letter, Mr Maule
called upon me at the Beaufort Arms [Monmouth]
said I have had your letter and ... /now?/
come to be scolded I said I was placed
in an unpleasant position between
the Grand Jury pressing for the Bills
and the magistrates requiring me
to proceed with the Bills and that
I wished to know the intentions of
the Crown upon the subject. He said
upon referring to the cases that
he did not think a case could be
supported ag - st Thomas Davies No 5
or Jno Lewis Llewellin No 20 &
that as regards Wm Davies whatever
may be done in his case not to
prefer any Bill pending
the present Trials but estreat his
Recognizances for the present I replied
that such a course would not

Tudalen 2:
be satisfactory to the magistrates
who were determined to prosecute if
the Crown did not and that as
a means of getting over the difficulty
I proposed seeing Wrightman with
the papers & taking his opinion
upon the 2 Cases which Mr Maule
assented to and I took Copy Dep[osition]s:
ag-st Thomas Davies No 5 and
a Newspaper report of the Exam-ons
before the magistrates of Jno Lewis
Llewellin No 20 with addl Evidence
of George Essex , John Parry and
Keziah Harris . Mr W[r]ightman[?]
subsequently saw me with Mr
Maule and stated he did not
see what offence Thos Davies No 5

Tudalen 3:
could be indicted for and that the
case agst J[n]o Llewellyn No 20 was
so far back that the attorney Genl
would not prosecute I replied
the magistrates required proceedings
to be taken ags-t both but
particularly Llewellin who I
considered a case of Sedition ags-t
& that I sh[oul]d[?] see the magistrates
I did see the magistrates and they
requested me to look carefully into
the Evidence & to see them tomorrow

[at foot]
1 Jany 1839 Preferred Bill ag-st John Partridge
for Conspiracy and Riot and upon the Bill being
Deld into Court Mr Maule exclaimed ag-st it
most vehemently & stated there was no case and that the
attorney would not prosecute

Tudalen 4:
Mem

Oes gennych chi wybodaeth ychwanegol am yr eitem hon? Gadewch sylwad isod

Sylwadau (0)

Rhaid mewngofnodi i bostio sylw